<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Creative COW | Adriano Castaldini | Activity</title>
	<link>https://creativecow.net/members/adrianocastaldini/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://creativecow.net/members/adrianocastaldini/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Adriano Castaldini.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 16:31:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.5.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5c2f82aee0cff5866d1bc624b8abc641</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini started the discussion Disguising FOA Multitrack session behind an Au 5.1 project? in the forum Adobe Audition</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/disguising-foa-multitrack-session-behind-an-au-5-1-project/</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2023 03:05:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/disguising-foa-multitrack-session-behind-an-au-5-1-project/">Disguising FOA Multitrack session behind an Au 5.1 project?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi everyone, I&#8217;ll be sincere: I&#8217;ve yet wrote a pretty similar question on the official Adobe Audition forum, but I didn&#8217;t find the answer I was searching for.<br />The point is: I&#8217;m going to start an ambisonic project, I&#8217;d use Adobe Audition for cleaning, balancing and reparing (healing brush) the FOA clips one by one, then I&#8217;d use Reaper for the FOA&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-378404"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/disguising-foa-multitrack-session-behind-an-au-5-1-project/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">de0a49f87673e0f334bdd8d457d801e3</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini replied to the discussion What is the best bang-for-buck computer for Resolve? in the forum DaVinci Resolve</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/not-so-free-after-all/#post-2403231</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2021 15:33:56 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/not-so-free-after-all/#post-2403231"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> What is the best bang-for-buck computer for Resolve?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi, I run Davinci 17 on an hackintosh. I work mainly on cDNG 14-bit RAW uncompressed 2K-flat (scaling original HD to 2K flat).</p>
<p>Main issues I experienced with Davinci are: GPU and drive-speed.<br /><span>For this reason I set my hackintosh in this way:<br />-CPU: old i7 EXTREME 10-core 6950X;<br />-MB: old Gigabyte X99P SLI (with 1x TB3);<br />-Ram: 64 GB;<br />-2 GPUs: 2x Radeon&hellip;</span></p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-345603"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/not-so-free-after-all/#post-2403231" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dcb165496b1107924d5e5ddee4dd5a65</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini replied to the discussion Affinity anyone? in the forum Creative Community Conversations</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/affinity-anyone/#post-2403114</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2021 06:22:07 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/affinity-anyone/#post-2403114"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Affinity anyone?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi Don. I can give you a personal opinion only about audio side. I love Audition too, and I used it a lot. Logic is not a replacement for Audition. Logic is a completely different software, much more composition-oriented. Audition, instead, has a “scientific attitude” about audio, and many great features of its waveform tab are simply uno&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-345487"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/affinity-anyone/#post-2403114" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4b68c545b859c39d3714a726451db280</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini started the discussion Rode NT-SF1 vs Sennheiser Ambeo VR Mic in the forum Audio</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/rode-nt-sf1-vs-sennheiser-ambeo-vr-mic/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2021 23:14:13 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/rode-nt-sf1-vs-sennheiser-ambeo-vr-mic/">Rode NT-SF1 vs Sennheiser Ambeo VR Mic</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>somebody has any experience about these two mics? Which is the most durable between the two?</p>
<p>I had a bad experience buying an NT-SF1 with a damaged capsule (noise signal was WAY louder than the other capsules, and after tried unscrewing/rescrewing the problem gets worst being now always at 0dB with a huge hum!) <br />I initially chose NT-SF1&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-345294"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/rode-nt-sf1-vs-sennheiser-ambeo-vr-mic/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">73e21b025dadc3c3d7b72c7d43122c28</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini replied to the discussion Ambisonic vs scratch for the ambience-layer of a 5.1-film? in the forum Audio</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/#post-2402085</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2021 16:28:29 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/#post-2402085"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Ambisonic vs scratch for the ambience-layer of a 5.1-film?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Carissimo Luca, </p>
<p>thanks so much for Your kind reply. Your post is an appreciated confirmation of the decision I took very-few days ago: I finally bought the Rode NT-SF1. As You wrote, ambisonic «can ease some of the burden of creating a basic environment.» I completely agree.<br />So, I&#8217;ll test the mic in these days and I&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>Thanks so much.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Adriano</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a148cbbad10f2029fcf207cf4edb395b</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini replied to the discussion Ambisonic vs scratch for the ambience-layer of a 5.1-film? in the forum Audio</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/#post-2349806</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 02:53:19 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/#post-2349806"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Ambisonic vs scratch for the ambience-layer of a 5.1-film?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Dear Mr. Ford, many thanks for Your kind reply.</p>
<p>Just a question: let say I&#8217;d start with an ambient recording in order to use that as a simple sound “base” for a scene, and over that “base” I&#8217;d add some mono-foley-sounds for the “main” objects in the scene. Now, moving a mono-sound in a 5.1 space is not so-difficult, but my question is about the ”&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-343189"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/#post-2349806" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a281fe1ba38dc2afe8f80f7bd652da7f</guid>
				<title>Adriano Castaldini started the discussion Ambisonic vs scratch for the ambience-layer of a 5.1-film? in the forum Audio</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2021 13:19:43 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/">Ambisonic vs scratch for the ambience-layer of a 5.1-film?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Hi everyone and happy new year. I&#8217;m a newbie and I&#8217;d need some tips about “ambience”. I&#8217;m currently working on a personal project that&#8217;s a narrative film with 5.1 audio. Being mostly self-taught, I tried to figure out which could be a schematic layers-partition for the audio, and I imagine it&#8217;s roughly Dialogue, Music, Ambience and SFX (in whi&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-342551"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/ambisonic-vs-scratch-for-the-ambience-layer-of-a-5-1-film/" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		