<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Creative COW | Tamara Margulis | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://creativecow.net/members/tamaramargulis/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://creativecow.net/members/tamaramargulis/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of Tamara Margulis's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2026 18:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.5.10</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4b437bc8c7a9b90f5de84a1c65540b00</guid>
				<title>Adam Lewen replied to the discussion VFX forum? Here? Looking for movies that accrues in the 1970&#039;s (VFX) in the forum Adobe After Effects</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/vfx-forum-here-looking-for-movies-that-accrues-in-the-1970s-vfx/#post-2336591</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 14:43:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/vfx-forum-here-looking-for-movies-that-accrues-in-the-1970s-vfx/#post-2336591"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> VFX forum? Here? Looking for movies that accrues in the 1970's (VFX)</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>Thanks! :-)&#8230;.<br />I didn&#8217;t think of that!</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e81d66ff0f015c1a2b84bc5e1f9a67c8</guid>
				<title>Ron Lindeboom updated their profile</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/news-feed/p/333840/</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:51:38 +0000</pubDate>

				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9267e0de942dcc763111d252bbcfe87a</guid>
				<title>Ron Lindeboom replied to the discussion this new font is much harder to read..anyone agree? in the forum Letters to the COW Team</title>
				<link>https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/this-new-font-is-much-harder-to-read-anyone-agree/#post-2334823</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2020 04:29:15 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/this-new-font-is-much-harder-to-read-anyone-agree/#post-2334823"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> this new font is much harder to read..anyone agree?</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>We are using the new <b>Google Noto</b> (No Tofu) font because some browsers and systems, not to mention language support, cause the &#8220;tofu&#8221; phenomenon when missing type characters produce those rectangles instead of the desired font characters. Google&#8217;s new Noto font took them years to develop and it produces a complete typeset regardless of browser, or&hellip;</p>
<p><span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-333256"><a href="https://creativecow.net/forums/thread/this-new-font-is-much-harder-to-read-anyone-agree/#post-2334823" rel="nofollow"> Read more</a></span></p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		